Every AI decision, examiner-ready.
One signed, replayable receipt per decision — ours or any vendor's. A sample becomes the case file an examiner reads.
Five vendors. Five audit trails. No common shape.
An examiner asks how one AI output shaped one decision. The answer sits in five different logs.
Vendor names illustrative.
Sample case files
NAIC Exhibit C asks how outputs shaped specific decisions.
Every vendor logs differently
Stitching one decision together is manual, file after file.
A senior officer attests
That signature needs evidence, not a folder of vendor emails.
Capture. Seal. Sample. Assemble. Hand over.
Gothink AIR's decisions and other vendors' enter the same chain.
Capture
Witness API, log import or vendor kit
Seal
Chained, signed with your key
Sample
A sample anyone can re-draw
Case file
One per sampled decision
Examiner
Read-only, access that expires
Fingerprints, not copies
Receipts hold references and hashes — never the raw payloads.
Replayable
Re-run an AIR decision under its original policy, or today's.
Nothing half-stored
Events missing required fields are rejected, with the reason.
One case file per sampled decision.
Readable without calling anyone. The signature check is built in.
- The AI output, and how it was used
- Who reviewed it, and what they did
- The policy in force at the time
- Source pages, wherever a citation exists
Insurance fairness testing
Adverse-impact testing, plus a review of external data sources.
Senior-officer attestation
Scoped, dated, chained. Packs flag anything unattested.
Examiner portal
Read-only, time-limited. Nothing can be changed.
Exam-ready for every carrier you serve.
Vendors emit receipts once. Carriers track the terms that matter.
Exam-ready, once
A client library and a published event schema. Carriers get receipts in the same format as Gothink AIR's.
Eight contract terms, tracked
Each moves from missing → requested → received → verified.
Statuses illustrative.
Your keys sign. A trusted clock dates.
Customer-held keys
A key in your own account.
Trusted timestamps
Dates do not rest on our clock.
Evidence from every surface.
Four sources in. One ledger. The examiner out.
Vendor reliability
Each vendor's accuracy, estimated without ground truth.
NewAutonomy console
Unattended only while reviewed error stays within a strict limit.
New · 26 SepClaims in the sample
Sampled claims open with their full trail.
New · 26 SepEU AI Act drafts
Annex IV and Article 27 drafts — not a conformity assessment.
New · 26 SepSigning you can require
Refuse to start below a minimum signing level.
NewExaminer portal
Time-boxed, signed access to case files.
GuideNAIC report readiness
Which evidence answers which question.
Open methodAttestation benchmark
Includes a case-file completeness measure.
Ask across every decision.
In the v1.1.0 runtime; current release governance-119 (15 October 2026).
Which decisions used this?
Every receipt linked to the document versions, model, people by role, policy and release it names. Each link can be rebuilt and checked against the receipts.
A decision, end to end
The document, version and pages a decision rested on, in its case file.
What would change this decision
For rule-engine decisions, the change that would alter the outcome — never who a person is — and a review priority from named signals.
A banking profile
SR 26-2 / OCC 2026-13 and ECOA / Reg B; replay across every product; vendor contract gaps said plainly.
One borrower’s file
Every decision, call and grievance that names them, from an exact identifier that is never stored. Every opening states a purpose and is sealed.
Rules beside each health record
Your business rules run in shadow beside the AI recommendation and the reviewer’s decision, and show where they would have sent a case to a person.
Shape the case file your examiner reads.
We are looking for insurers, banks and AI vendors as design partners to measure it.
Name your AI vendors
We map the terms and evidence each can give.
Record one use case
Receipts captured; a sample assembled into case files.
Read it as an examiner
Your compliance team tells us what is missing.
Build your case files with us.
We are looking for design partners to measure it against real examiner questions.